• Home
  • Products | Services
    • PM ULTRA
      • Benefits
    • Electronic Medical Records
      • Benefits
      • e-Prescribing
    • Medical Management
      • Benefits
      • e-Claims | Remittance
    • Appointment Scheduling
      • Benefits
      • Eligibility
    • Patient Portal
      • Benefits
    • Specialties
      • Cardiology
      • Dermatology
      • OB | Gyn Practice
      • Pediatrics and Family Practice
      • Psychiatry
    • Quick Demos
      • Electronic Medical Records Quick Demo
      • Medical Billing | Management Demo
      • Appointment Scheduling
  • Knowledge Center
    • EHR Stimulus
    • Meaningful Use
    • ONC | CCHIT Certification
    • ICD 10 Codes
  • Resources | Technical
    • PC Based vs. Web Based
    • Technical Support
    • Hardware Requirements
      • Small Office Configuration
      • Advanced Configuration
    • Data Conversions | Lab Interfaces
    • Integration Partners
  • News Blog
    • AMS Advisor E-News
    • Archive
  • Company
    • Careers
    • VAR | Referral Program
    • Testimonials
    • Contact Info | Map
    • Site Map

Electronic Medical Records Due By 2015

Posted by AMS at 28 DEC 8:30 am

According to hospital and health care facilities administrators, electronic medical records are essential for improving the safety, quality and efficiency of health care in rural areas. Such electronic medical records are already available at many hospitals in larger cities, but for small rural facilities they are a major expense, especially since many of them struggle financially. Most facilities in rural areas do not have electronic medical records yet, and some administrators worry they will not be able to meet the requirements for government payments starting next year to help support the cost. However, facilities that do not have the electronic records fully in place by 2015 will be penalized by lower payments from Medicare and Medicaid.


According to Mile Bluff Clinic administrator Carol Fronk, the Mauston-based facility will spend more than $2 million to implement the electronic medical records, and it even got broadband Internet in August in order to support them. Still, connections to satellite clinics such as those in Elroy, Lake Delton and Necedah do not have broadband service, and many small towns face the same obstacle. The Memorial Medical Center in Neillsville will spend $1.2 million to install the electronic medical records, nearly twice the amount the hospital made last year, said the facility’s chief executive officer, Scott Polenz.


The CEO added that Memorial lost $250,000 the previous year, but this year they sold the nursing home to prepare for the costs of electronic medical records. Also, according to Karen Myers, vice president of financial services, Stoughton Hospital will spend $1.6 million to launch electronic medical records early next year. Myers added that the Stoughton Hospital is able to move faster than some due to its affiliation with SSM Health Care of Wisconsin. Louis Wenzlow, health information technology director at the Rural Wisconsin Health Cooperative in Sauk City, noted that out of Wisconsin’s 69 rural hospitals, about a dozen will be able to start using the electronic medical records on time and receive substantial reimbursements, another dozen or so hospitals are making significant efforts, while the rest are struggling. Most hospitals have to spend large amounts of money before learning if their expenses qualify for the government help, but the requirements are complicated and many hospitals may fail to receive payments.



Categories: EHR Health Care News, Electronic Medical Records, News Blog

AMS-EMR Receives ONC-ATCB 2011/12 Certification

Posted by AMS at 21 DEC 12:37 pm

AMERICAN MEDICAL SOFTWARE-EMR RECEIVES ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 CERTIFICATION

December 21, 2010 – American Medical Software announced today that American Medical Software-EMR v22 is 2011/2012 compliant and was certified as a Complete EHR on December 15, 2010 by the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT®), an ONC-ATCB, in accordance with the applicable Eligible Provider certification criteria adopted by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The 2011/2012 criteria support the Stage 1 meaningful use measures required to qualify eligible providers and hospitals for funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).


W. David Scott, President stated “We believe this certification demonstrates American Medical Software’s commitment to our clients that we will continue to develop and maintain our software products to remain on the leading edge of technology and support all regulatory requirements in a timely fashion, just as we have for the last 26 years!”


The ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification program tests and certifies that Complete EHRs meet all of the 2011/2012 criteria and EHR Modules meet one or more – but not all – of the criteria approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) for either eligible provider or hospital technology.


“CCHIT is pleased to be testing and certifying products so that companies are now able to offer these products to providers who wish to purchase and implement certified EHR technology and achieve meaningful use in time for the 2011-2012 incentives,” said Karen M. Bell, M.D., M.S.S., Chair, CCHIT.


American Medical Software –EMR Version 22’s certification number is CC-1112-125863-1. ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification conferred by CCHIT does not represent an endorsement of the certified EHR technology by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services nor does it guarantee the receipt of incentive payments.


The clinical quality measures to which American Medical Software-EMR has been certified include:
NQF 0421, NQF 0013, NQF 0028, NQF 0041, NQF 0024, NQF 0038, NQF 0059, NQF 0061 and NQF 0064

The additional software American Medical Software-EMR relied upon to demonstrate compliance includes: RxNT for 170.302(a), 170.302(b), 170.302(m) and 170.304(b), Intuit Health Patient Portal for 170.304(g) and Filezilla for 170.302(s) and 170.302(v).


About American Medical Software
American Medical Software has been serving physicians of all specialties nationwide for over 26 years. As a privately held corporation, we are very proud that our software systems are robust and versatile in larger practice settings while being affordable for even the small solo practice. American Medical Software – EMR is available as a stand-alone system and is included in our fully integrated Practice Management ULTRA System, which in addition to Electronic Medical Records also features Medical Billing/Management, Appointment Scheduling and Patient Portal. Phone/Web training is included with each new system. All product development, support and training is provided by our staff of trained professionals. Since our beginning in 1984, AMS clients have repeatedly expressed how user friendly our software is and how helpful our technical support service is.


About CCHIT
The Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT®) is an independent, 501(c)3 nonprofit organization with the public mission of accelerating the adoption of robust, interoperable health information technology. The Commission has been certifying electronic health record technology since 2006 and is approved by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as an Authorized Testing and Certification Body (ONC-ATCB). More information on CCHIT, CCHIT Certified® products and ONC-ATCB certified electronic health record technology is available at http://cchit.org.
About ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification


The ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification program tests and certifies that EHR technology is capable of meeting the 2011/2012 criteria approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). The certifications include Complete EHRs, which meet all of the 2011/2012 criteria for either eligible provider or hospital technology and EHR Modules, which meet one or more – but not all – of the criteria. ONC-ATCB certification aligns with Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology published in the Federal Register in July 2010 and strictly adheres to the test procedures published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) at the time of testing. ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification conferred by the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT®) does not represent an endorsement of the certified EHR technology by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services nor does it guarantee the receipt of incentive payments.


“CCHIT®” and “CCHIT Certified®” are registered trademarks of the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology.

Media Contacts: Robert D. Bridgman, Marketing Director, 800-423-8836



Categories: AMS Slider Images, EHR Health Care News, News Blog

Research On EMR Improving Healthcare

Posted by AMS at 21 DEC 7:11 am

Saves time & money & improve the quality of healthcare is among the objectives of a multidisciplinary research team at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Mechanical Engineering Prof. Isa Bar-On & Professor Diane Strong, Associate Professor Sharon Johnson in the Management lead an international study that seeks into help bring the U.S. healthcare system into the digital age by replacing paper-based records into electronic health records (EMR) systems.



Categories: EHR Health Care News, Electronic Medical Records, News Blog, Video - Health Care News

Electronic Medical Records Use Over Majority

Posted by AMS at 14 DEC 7:09 am

Government survey finds that a slim majority of physicians are now using electronic health records or electronic medical records systems.

Results from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) show that between 2009 and 2010, the percentage of physicians reporting having an electronic medical record/electronic health record (EMR/EHR) system that meets the criteria of a basic system increased by 14% and a fully functional system increased by 46%.

The survey, published earlier this month and conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), found that preliminary 2010 estimates were that 51% of physicians reported using complete or partial EMR/EHR systems, versus 48% last year. About 25% reported having systems that met the criteria of a basic system, up from 22% last year, and 10% reported having systems that met the criteria of a fully functional system, an improvement from 2009 when 7% said they were using systems that met the requirements of a fully functional EHR/EMR system.

The annual survey of office-based physicians collects information on the adoption and use of EMRs/EHRs. From April through July 2010, the NCHS sent mail surveys and conducted follow-up phone interviews with physicians who provide direct patient care in office-based practices, including clinicians in community health centers. The report noted that radiologists, anesthesiologists, and pathologists were not included in the survey.

Another report, published last week by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), also examined the adoption of EHRs and concluded that almost 80% of physicians — the majority in small, independent practices — lack even rudimentary digital records.

The report, Realizing the Full Potential of Health Information Technology to Improve Healthcare for Americans: The Path Forward, also noted that most physicians who do use electronic systems don’t make full use of their potential functionality. Further, the sharing of health information electronically remains the exception rather than the rule.

PCAST’s report also outlined several barriers to adopting EHRs including:

– Many healthcare providers do not have the economic incentives and technical expertise to purchase and use EHRs. Physicians who do adopt EHRs often find they are spending extra hours each day to type in orders, notes from patient visits, or measures to be reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) without receiving commensurate benefits.

– The current structure of health IT systems makes it difficult to extract the full value of the data generated. Most EHRs resemble digital renditions of paper records. This means that physicians can have trouble finding the information they need, and patients often wind up with poor access to their own health data and little ability to use it for their own purpose.

– Standards and infrastructure are lacking that would allow information to be easily shared across organizations. Relevant information does not seamlessly move with patients who receive care from multiple providers.

– Patients are concerned that the storage of their health information in electronic form will make it easier for employers, insurers, government, or malicious electronic intruders to improperly access their records.

Source:  Nicole Lewis ,  InformationWeek
December 13, 2010 02:18 PM



Categories: EHR Health Care News, Electronic Medical Records
Tags: CDC, EHR, Survey

Facebook and Electronic Medical Records

Posted by AMS at 7 DEC 6:57 am

(Dec. 6) — Americans find long-lost friends on Facebook. They meet on Facebook. They post pictures of parties, vacations or even family photos on Facebook. But what Mark Zuckerberg probably never dreamed of when he invented this social network tool to connect college students was that Facebook would someday save a life. Social media has become a tool in the medical world to diagnose patients, treat them and save their lives.


In the past few years, we have urged hospitals and doctors to move from a paper record system to an electronic one to reduce the number of medical errors, improve efficiency and, as a result, save lives and money. Among the many benefits, an electronic medical record should give the treating physician a portable, immediately accessible and thorough account of a patient’s entire medical history.


But now social media is helping the medical community enhance the practice of medicine even more.

This past summer, a 56-year-old woman checked into the emergency room of Sacred Heart Hospital in Eau Claire, Wis., complaining of chest discomfort. She said she’d been in and out of several hospitals over several weeks, yet doctors couldn’t find what was really wrong with her.

Within hours, she had lapsed into a coma. Doctors later determined that she’d sustained a massive stroke, causing paralysis and coma. There was also evidence of multiple prior strokes and fluid around her heart, something unusual for a patient so young. She rapidly deteriorated toward death.


She was a single mother who lived far from any close family members. Hospital personnel talked to her son, but he could provide little information. It was discovered that she had a Facebook account.

Every doctor will attest that to make a proper diagnosis he or she needs a thorough account of a patient’s medical history. That’s why the doctor-patient relationship is so important. It is also why you see physicians on TV shows like “House” go to great lengths to discover everything about a patient.

In the case of the woman in a coma at Sacred Heart, her diary like postings on Facebook were a far more detailed and complete accounting of her health than even her stack of medical records. More important, they were a far more relevant accounting because they detailed her medical history in her own words.

On Facebook she posted her medications, symptoms, hospitalizations and conditions dating back months. She had dates, times and descriptions of how she felt and what was occurring with her body.

That led the medical team at Sacred Heart to discover that the woman not only had a hole in her heart but that she’d been throwing blood clots to the brain, which caused the strokes. As a result, a treatment plan including lifesaving brain surgery was put in place. Today, she is out of a coma, has made great progress and is undergoing speech and physical therapy.

What does this case tell us about the future of medicine? Like everything in society, social media is having an enormous impact on our personal lives, in ways we never imagined. Everyone self-publishes their own stories.

Police officers are using Facebook to fight crime and hunt terrorists. And now physicians are discovering a whole new world of utilizing social media to chronicle medical conditions of patients. As people document their health on the Web, it is easy for anyone — including doctors — to discover what is really going on.

This intersection of medicine and the digital world is worth exploring as the Facebook generation takes us to new heights we never dreamed with the World Wide Web.

Yet it also reminds us that at the heart of our 21st century health system is the individual patient. A personalized system that puts the individual at the center and helps us make decisions based on the needs of the individual will become even more accessible — and more important — as the digital world expands in ways that can save lives and save money.

Newt Gingrich, the former speaker of the House, is the founder of the Center for Health Transformation. Dr. Kamal Thapar is a neurosurgeon at Sacred Heart Hospital who utilized Facebook with a patient last summer to save her life. To protect the patient’s privacy, her name has not been disclosed.

Source: AOL News

Newt Gingrich and Kamal Thapar, M.D.



Categories: EHR Health Care News, Social Media & Health Care
Tags: EMR, Facebook, Medical Records

Categories

  • AMS Slider Images
  • EHR Health Care News
  • Electronic Medical Records
  • News Blog
  • Social Media & Health Care
  • Stimulus News
  • Video – Health Care News
  • Videos – Client Testimonials

RESOURCES | TECHNICAL

  • Advisor E-News Letters
  • Quick Demos
  • Request Information
  • Technical Site Login
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Software • All Rights Reserved. | Designed by Cox Group   Legal notice   Privacy Policy
Back to top