• Home
  • Products | Services
    • PM ULTRA
      • Benefits
    • Electronic Medical Records
      • Benefits
      • e-Prescribing
    • Medical Billing – Revenue Management
      • Benefits
      • e-Claims | Remittance
    • Appointment Scheduling
      • Benefits
      • Eligibility
    • Patient Portal
    • Specialties
      • Cardiology
      • Dermatology
      • OB | Gyn Practice
      • Pediatrics and Family Practice
      • Psychiatry
    • Quick Demos
      • Electronic Medical Records Quick Demo
      • Medical Billing | Management Demo
      • Appointment Scheduling
  • Knowledge Center
    • EHR Stimulus
    • Meaningful Use
    • ONC | CCHIT Certification
    • ICD 10 Codes
  • Resources | Technical
    • PC Based vs. Web Based
    • Technical Support
    • Hardware Recommendations
    • Data Conversions | Lab Interfaces
    • Integration Partners
  • News Blog
    • AMS Advisor E-News
    • Archive
  • Company
    • Why AMS?
    • Testimonials
    • VAR | Referral Program
    • Careers
    • Contact Info | Map
    • Site Map

Top Impacts of Problem Lists on Interoperability and Meaningful Use

Posted by AMS at 21 MAY 10:36 am

During last week’s webcast, held by the Health Resources and Services Administration, presenters from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) and Blackstone Valley Community Health Care in Pawtucket, RI provided an overview of the aim of problems lists in the EHR Incentive Programs as well as the challenges involved in satisfying this requirement in current and future stages of meaningful use.

As noted by one of the presenters, structured problem lists will be key to enabling EHR interoperability moving forward with meaningful use. “As we all realize, interoperability will play a major role going forward in Meaningful Use Stage 2 and beyond, and we can be expected to interoperable with other healthcare providers and the different HIT systems used at various practice sites,” said Raymond J. Lavoie.

And why is this? As it turns out, most of the data needed to be exchanged from eligible provider to eligible provider traces its origins back to the problem list.

“One of the foundations of this capability will be the common dataset prescribed for all summary of care records by the final rules for Stage 2,” explained Lavoie. “Each element of the summary of care record will include a structured and coded dataset uniformly formatted and capable of being securely transmitted for transitions of care, for referrals, discharge, and also shared directly with the patient. In short, it will be a common language that is understandable by all certified EHR technology systems. Any of the elements in the summary of care record are derived from or are uniquely related to the problem list.”

Beginning in Stage 1 Meaningful Use, eligible hospitals are required to maintain up-to-date problem lists for current and active diagnoses. Specifically, the measure calls for providers to have “at least one entry or an indication that no problems are known for that patient recorded as structured data” for more than 80 percent of unique patients seen.

Stage 2 Meaningful Use approaches problem lists differently by featuring problem lists in requirements for summaries of care and view, download, and transmit (VDT) instead of in its own objective.  For eligible professionals, hospitals, and critical access hospitals in Stage 2, they must provide summaries of care, which include current, active, and historical diagnoses, for patients transitioned or referred to another provider. Additionally, patients must have the ability within four business days to VDT although the problem list is not a required element.

Although the specifics of Stage 3 Meaningful Use are still being ironed out, early indications are that problem lists will be integrated in an objective for clinical decision support (CDS) as well as other requirements for the reconciliation of problems lists, maintenance of summaries of care, and increased emphasis on VDT

Source: www.ehrintelligence.com; Kyle Murphey; May 21, 2013.



Categories: EHR Health Care News, Electronic Medical Records, News Blog, News Updates

E-Prescribing Deadline Approaching

Posted by AMS at 14 MAY 10:53 am

e-prescribingClinicians slow to adapt to digital medicine have until June 30 to electronically transmit 10 prescriptions to the pharmacy for Medicare patients, and thereby avoid a 2% cut in their Medicare reimbursement next year.

The 2% penalty is the punitive side of a federal program designed to motivate physicians and other clinicians to replace their prescription pads with iPads, smart phones, and the like. In 2010, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) began paying bonuses to clinicians who e-prescribe for their Medicare patients. The bonus that year was 2% of a clinician’s Medicare reimbursement. In 2013, the final year for these incentive payments, the bonus is 0.5%.

Last year, Medicare began penalizing clinicians who had not previously qualified as “successful electronic prescribers,” in CMS parlance, or electronically transmitted at least 10 scripts for Medicare patients in the first half of the 2011. That number of e-prescriptions, reported to CMS through G codes on Medicare claims, is not enough to earn a bonus, but it staves off the penalty, which was 1% in 2012. The penalty disappears after 2014.

Clinicians will be exempt from the 2% penalty in 2014 if they:

  • — qualified for an e-prescribing bonus during 2012;
  • — did not have at least 100 Medicare claims in the first 6 months of 2013 with 1 of the 50-plus billing codes that must be associated with an e-prescription for it to count toward the bonus;
  • — did not generate 10% or more of their Medicare allowable charges in the first 6 months of 2013 with the required billing codes;
  • — were not a physician, podiatrist, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant as of June 30;
  • — achieved “meaningful use” under the Medicare or Medicaid incentive programs for electronic health record (EHR) systems in either 2012 or the first 6 months of 2013, and reported that to CMS by June 30, 2013;
  • — registered to participate in one of the EHR incentive programs by June 30 and adopted certified EHR technology; or
  • — Lacked prescribing privileges and indicated that with code G8644 at least once on a Medicare claim before June 30.

Clinicians also can apply for one of several hardship exemptions, which include practicing in a rural area without sufficient high-speed Internet access and being barred by local, state, or federal law from e-prescribing. The deadline for a hardship exemption application, accomplished with a G code on a Medicare claim, is June 30.

More information about avoiding the Medicare e-prescribing penalty is available on the CMS Web site.

Source: www.medspace.com; Robert Lowes; May 7, 2013.



Categories: EHR Health Care News, Electronic Medical Records, News Blog, News Updates

Bill Would Prohibit HHS From Mandating ICD-10 Transition

Posted by AMS at 7 MAY 1:15 pm

HHSRep. Ted Poe (R-Texas) has introduced a bill (HR 1701) that would prohibit HHS from mandating that health care providers switch to ICD-10 code sets, ICD-10 Watch reports (Natale, ICD-10 Watch, 4/25).

About ICD-10

U.S. health care organizations are working to transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 code sets to accommodate codes for new diseases and procedures. The switch from ICD-9 to ICD-10 code sets means that health care providers and insurers will have to change out about 14,000 codes for about 69,000 codes.

In August 2012, HHS released a final rule that officially delayed the ICD-10 compliance date until
Oct. 1, 2014.

In December 2012, the American Medical Association — along with 42 state medical organizations and 40 medical specialty groups – sent a letter urging CMS to halt the implementation of ICD-10 code sets and instead find an “appropriate replacement” for ICD-9 code sets.

Previous Comments From Poe

During a speech on the House floor earlier this month, Poe called the ICD-10 mandate “red tape” and “bureaucracy.” According to Poe, complying with the new ICD-10 coding system will cost about $80,000 for individual doctors and about $250,000 for physician practices with five to 10 doctors.

He also noted that the level of detail required for ICD-10 coding would pose challenges for health care providers (iHealthBeat, 4/11).

Legislation Details

Poe’s bill states that it would “prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services [from] replacing ICD-9 with ICD-10 in implementing the HIPAA code set standards” (ICD-10 Watch, 4/25).

The legislation has been introduced to the House Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees (Linder, Becker’s Hospital Review, 4/29).

Both committees need to approve HR 1701 before it can advance to the full House (ICD-10 Watch, 4/25).

Source: www.ihealthbeat.org; April 30, 2013



Categories: EHR Health Care News, Electronic Medical Records, News Blog, News Updates

ONC Offers Rural Providers Some Health Information Exchange Guidance

Posted by AMS at 30 APR 9:58 am

health information exchangeMade available through the ONC’s National Rural Health Resource Center, the toolkit provides a set of “practical” HIE resources designed to help rural health stakeholders, including State Offices of Rural Health and Flex Programs, rural hospitals and clinics, critical access hospitals (CAHs), rural health networks, and other invested parties, develop and manage HIEs.

The toolkit includes the following components:

Health Information Exchange – First Considerations. This document covers the first steps in forming or joining an HIE. The guide also includes a readiness self-assessment tool designed around governance, sustainability, technology, legal and policy, provider adoption, evaluation and consumer engagement domains.

HIE DIRECT Guide. Included in this guide are a description of technologies used, a glossary of terms and recommendations on implementing DIRECT, which is a set of standards, protocols and services that enable simple, secure electronic transport of health information (push messaging) between healthcare participants (e.g. providers, labs). The goal of DIRECT is to facilitate “direct” communication with a focus towards more advanced levels of interoperability than simple paper can provide.

ROI Calculator.  This spreadsheet calculates potential savings and costs of implementing an electronic health record (EHR) and a health information exchange (HIE). Sources are listed along with each calculation.

Privacy and Security Overview and Resource List.  This compilation of resources includes the privacy and security requirements for organizations participating in an HIE as well as a list of HIPAA-related resources.

HIE Policy Matrix. This document provides “policy models” adapted from The Connecting for Health Common Framework. The policy suggestions specifically emanate from Section P2: Model Privacy Policies and Procedures for Health Information Exchange, which contains much of the necessary policy and procedure language needed for an HIE.

Source: www.himsswire.com; March 5, 2013.



Categories: EHR Health Care News, Electronic Medical Records, News Blog, News Updates

Lawmakers Call For ‘Reboot’ of Meaningful Use Program

Posted by AMS at 23 APR 10:58 am

meaningful useSix Republican Senators have formally requested that U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius provide a written plan to address how the agency is implementing the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act.

In an April 16 letter–signed by Senators Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Richard Burr (R-N.C.), Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) and John Thune (R-S.D.)–they state that Congress has an obligation to conduct oversight of government programs. To that end, they released a 28-page white paper entitled “REBOOT: Re-Examining the Strategies Needed to Successfully Adopt Health IT” that outlines their concerns with current health IT policy, including the costs, interoperability, the potential for waste and abuse, patient privacy and sustainability.

“[W]e have significant concerns with the implementation of the HITECH Act to date, including the lack of data to support the Administration’s assertions that this taxpayer investment is being appropriately spent and actually achieving the goal of interoperable health IT,” the senators said in the letter.

The senators asked Sebelius to respond to the concerns cited in the white paper with a written plan, and to provide additional information, such as a list of all contracts awarded under the HITECH Act and the agency’s evaluation of state programs, a task required by HITECH. Expressing a desire for “robust dialogue,” the senators gave a deadline of June 16.

This is not the first time that Congress has expressed concerns about health IT. Last October, four House republicans urged Sebelius to change the course of the Meaningful Use program, and asked that its incentive payments be frozen until the agency promulgated universal interoperable standards. Last June, Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.) asked HHS to improve the safety of EHR systems, piggybacking on the Institute of Medicine’s 2011 report outlining similar concerns.

To learn more:
- read the letter (.pdf)
- here’s the senators’ white paper (.pdf)

Source: www.fierceemr.com; Marla Durben Hirsch; April 16, 2013.



Categories: EHR Health Care News, Electronic Medical Records, News Blog, News Updates
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Categories

  • AMS Slider Images
  • EHR Health Care News
  • Electronic Medical Records
  • News Blog
  • News Updates
  • Social Media & Health Care
  • Stimulus News
  • Video – Health Care News
  • Videos – Client Testimonials

RESOURCES | TECHNICAL

  • Advisor E-News Letters
  • Quick Demos
  • Request Information
  • Technical Site Login
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Software • All Rights Reserved. | Designed by Cox Group   Legal notice   Privacy Policy
Back to top